Libya: UN, EU, U.S., armed with good penalties
Written by The Fact's Daily 27/02/2011
A Ignazio La Russa, Minister of Defence, formerly the praetorian Fini, now bodyguard Mr. B, happen to stumble in the words: yesterday, he said something (almost) right, but then has run correctly and came out a bang. "The Treaty between Italy and Libya are not there more, is already suspended, it is irrelevant," he says in Livorno, where he visits the soldiers of the Folgore leaving for Afghanistan: And he, who had always maintained that ' Italy has never supplied arms to Libya, he suddenly remembers cedutele patrol boats to stop the boats of migrants and spèiega, a mo 'for instance, that "men of the financial police, who were on patrol oper Control The Libyans (without another to prevent them from firing on a vessel of Mazara del Vallo, ed) are now in our embassy. " And the good
Ignatius s'adegua change that line of prime ministers: Silvio Berlusconi admits that the 'friend', until I miss a week ago, Gaddafi has no more control of their country, and probably not even of his house and, having held back for several days stated: "Italy and the EU can not be spectators" of the Libyan crisis: "enough arguments" (essentially his work, so far, with European partners), we must "support the people of Libya" and "stop the bloodshed," but also to avoid "the danger of fundamentalism" and "landings out of control."
spend a few hours el'Ignazio fear that they did take off more than it should be: the Treaty, states, is not suspended, it's just irrelevant, just as her boyfriend to another, once the premier technical Lamberto Dini, finds that the suspension is in fact because "there is the other party", namely the rule Libya, "with which to enforce the clauses. And the opposition, more or less in unison, he asks, instead, to go further and to "immediately repeal the Treaty of shame", but friendship-words in quotation marks Pier Ferdinando Casini. " Meanwhile, La Russa
that splits hairs, the UN, the U.S. and the EU have been going on: maybe do a bit 'late, but go ahead. The Security Council of the United Nations is launching a series of penalties already developed after the U.S. president Barack Obama had been 'frozen', on Friday, the goods of Gaddafi over there. Too bad that, according to the Times, the Colonel had just moved to London three billion pounds.
However, the money of the dictator should not be safe and not even there, in fact: the EU is defining its sanctions (and British Prime Minister David Cameron will be among the major sponsor) and is also planning humanitarian intervention, beyond an initial action has already been allocated to three million euro and coordination of the evacuation of foreigners. Mind you, the penalties are now little more than a fig leaf that individual states and international organizations to cover wear make collusion and tolerance of years with the dictator of Tripoli, which now, however, want to bring to justice before the Hague Court if it will be proven crimes against humanity.
But the freezing of assets in the West and the possible denial of entry to the EU have no impact sull'epilogo story of the Libyan and even accelerate. In that, they can contribute rather than military intervention, as a flight ban on Libya (a 'no fly zone', such as those implemented unilaterally by the United States on Iraq), but it must be decided by the UN and possibly implemented by Nato would be to avoid the repression of the uprising from the sky. Impossible, however, the landing operation, which would only have negative connotations for the Libyan people.
E ', however, likely that the stalemate over the fate of Gaddafi unlock before the' no fly zone 'to be decided and implemented. A consultation within the Atlantic military could take place in Naples, according to a hypothesis suggested by La Russa British colleague Liam Fox. But there are still those who is opposed to the sanctions that the options 'interventions': turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that the consequences would weigh on innocent people and accused the West of "reason" only in terms of barrels of oil and "will make the world always using a safer place and only penalties.
Erdogan thinks, perhaps, in light of Islam. But all the wrongs he has not. We skipped the caps in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya soon, immediately we worry about what happen now: fundamentalism in power?, waves of terrorism ', or, less bloody, but more likely, waves of migrants to our shores? And already there is a longing for the step: another, for comfort us, not better and free them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment